Stay connected with KayaToday, follow us on Instagram and Facebook for the latest news and reviews delivered straight to you.
Few political promises in Malaysia carry as much historical weight as the guarantee that Sabah and Sarawak would be equal partners in the federation, not peripheral additions to a Peninsular-dominated parliament. That promise, embedded in the Malaysia Agreement 1963, has gone largely unfulfilled for over six decades. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim signalled on Thursday that the federal government intends to finally act on it, confirming that the Federal Constitution will be amended to allow an increase in parliamentary seats for both Borneo states.
Anwar made the announcement after chairing a Malaysia Agreement 1963 Implementation Action Council meeting in Kota Kinabalu, attended by Sabah Chief Minister Hajiji Noor, Sarawak Premier Abang Johari Openg, and Sabah and Sarawak Affairs Minister Mustapha Sakmud. The gathering was notable not just for who was in the room, but for what was decided in it.
What MA63 Actually Promised, and Why It Still Matters
The Malaysia Agreement 1963 was the founding compact under which Sabah, Sarawak, and Singapore joined Malaya to form Malaysia. Among its provisions was the understanding that the two Borneo states would hold meaningful political weight in the federal parliament, a recognition that they were not simply being absorbed but were entering as co-founders of a new nation. Singapore left the federation in 1965, but Sabah and Sarawak remained, and the question of whether their parliamentary representation has ever matched that founding intent has been a persistent grievance.
Today, Sabah holds 25 parliamentary seats and Sarawak holds 31, together accounting for roughly 35% of the 222 seats in the Dewan Rakyat. The oft-cited aspiration among MA63 advocates is that the two states should collectively hold 40% of total seats, a threshold that would require either adding seats in Sabah and Sarawak or restructuring the overall composition of parliament. Anwar, when asked directly whether the 40% figure was the target, said Putrajaya had not set a specific number, adding that the details and mechanism would be worked out with the Election Commission, the state governments, and other relevant parties.
A Constitutional Amendment Is Not a Small Thing
The significance of committing to a constitutional amendment should not be understated. Amending the Federal Constitution requires a two-thirds majority in both the Dewan Rakyat and the Dewan Negara, meaning the government needs broad parliamentary support, not just a simple majority. Anwar’s Unity Government currently commands a substantial majority in parliament, which makes the arithmetic feasible, but the political management of such a move, particularly around how any new seats are drawn and whether Peninsular Malaysia’s representation is affected, will require careful handling.
Anwar acknowledged that the possibility of additional seats in Peninsular Malaysia cannot be ruled out entirely, but was clear that any such expansion must not come at the expense of the primary objective of boosting Sabah and Sarawak’s share. The power to determine the number of parliamentary constituencies formally rests with the Election Commission, and Anwar confirmed that the EC will be central to the consultations that follow.
The constitutional amendment itself would set the legal ceiling for the number of seats. The EC would then conduct the redelineation exercise to determine how those seats are drawn. Both steps are required, and both carry their own timelines and procedural requirements, meaning this is a medium-term process rather than an imminent change.
The Political Stakes for Putrajaya and the Borneo States
For Anwar’s government, delivering on MA63 commitments serves a dual purpose. It fulfils a long-standing obligation that successive federal governments have acknowledged but deferred, and it reinforces the political loyalty of Sabah and Sarawak-based parties that form a critical part of the Unity Government’s coalition. Parties from both states have consistently made MA63 implementation a central demand, and tangible progress on parliamentary representation would be a concrete deliverable heading into the next general election cycle.
For Sabah and Sarawak, the stakes are about more than seat counts. Greater parliamentary representation translates directly into greater leverage over federal budget allocations, policy priorities, and the negotiation of state rights on issues ranging from oil royalties to immigration control. The two states have historically argued that their economic contributions, particularly through petroleum revenues, have not been matched by proportional political influence at the federal level.
Abang Johari has been among the most vocal advocates for full MA63 implementation, and his presence at Thursday’s meeting alongside Hajiji signals that both state governments are aligned and engaged on the issue. Whether that alignment holds through the detailed negotiations over seat numbers and boundaries will be the real test.
Why the Mechanism Matters as Much as the Commitment
Announcing intent to amend the constitution is meaningfully different from completing one. Malaysia has seen MA63-related commitments made and then stall in implementation before. The credibility of Thursday’s announcement will ultimately depend on the timeline Putrajaya sets for tabling the constitutional amendment, the scope of consultation with the EC and state governments, and whether the redelineation exercise that follows is conducted transparently.
None of those details have been confirmed yet. What exists today is a clear political commitment from the Prime Minister, made in the presence of both Borneo chief ministers, that the constitutional framework will be changed. That is further than previous governments have formally gone on this specific mechanism, and it sets a benchmark against which Anwar’s administration will be measured. If the amendment reaches parliament and passes, it would mark the most substantive structural change to Malaysia’s federal political architecture since the early years of the federation itself.
Read More: Former Tabung Haji Chairman Azeez Detained Ahead of Expected Graft Charges