Stay connected with KayaToday, follow us on Instagram and Facebook for the latest news and reviews delivered straight to you.
Nearly three years after one of the most spectacular collapses in financial history, the machinery of FTX’s bankruptcy estate is still grinding out cash. On July 31, the FTX Recovery Trust will begin its fifth round of creditor distributions, sending approximately $900 million to eligible claimants and pushing total repayments past the $10 billion mark since the exchange filed for Chapter 11 in November 2022.
The announcement came in a Friday notice from the FTX Recovery Trust. Creditors who qualify under the recovery plan’s convenience and non-convenience classes can expect funds routed through their BitGo, Kraken, or Payoneer accounts within one to three business days of the July 31 start date. Smaller claimants holding convenience claims under $50,000 will receive a 120% reimbursement, a figure that actually exceeds their original losses at the time of collapse. Larger creditors will receive between 103% and 105% of their claims.
How a Bankrupt Exchange Ended Up Paying Back More Than It Owed
The above-par recovery rates are not charity. They reflect the unusual mechanics of FTX’s bankruptcy estate, which benefited from the post-collapse appreciation of certain crypto assets held by the estate and from aggressive legal recoveries pursued by the trust. The March 2025 distribution alone amounted to $2.2 billion, and the cumulative total now approaching $10 billion represents a far better outcome than most creditors anticipated when FTX imploded amid a broader crypto market downturn that sent several other exchanges scrambling for Chapter 11 protection at the same time.
For Malaysian and Singaporean investors who held funds on FTX at the time of its collapse, the key practical question has always been access. Distributions are flowing through BitGo, Kraken, and Payoneer, all of which operate in the region, though individual creditors still need to have completed the claims verification process to be eligible. The Monetary Authority of Singapore had previously flagged FTX as being on its investor alert list, and the episode became a reference point for both MAS and Malaysia’s Securities Commission as they tightened licensing frameworks for digital asset exchanges in the years since.
The Legal Reckoning Continues Beyond the Exchange Itself
The creditor repayments are only one thread in a much larger web of litigation and accountability still playing out. In May 2025, law firm Fenwick and West, which had advised FTX before its collapse, agreed to pay $54 million to settle a class action lawsuit brought by former users. That settlement came just days after a group of 20 FTX creditors had sued the firm for $525 million, making the $54 million figure a significant discount on the claimed damages but still a notable outcome for a professional services firm caught in the blast radius of a client’s fraud.
Former FTX co-CEO Ryan Salame, who ran the exchange’s Bahamian affiliate, remains in federal prison. So does Sam Bankman-Fried, who was convicted in 2024 on criminal charges related to the misuse of customer funds and sentenced to 25 years. Bankman-Fried had pleaded not guilty throughout his trial. A federal appellate court last month upheld the original New York conviction, closing off that avenue of relief.
Why the Senate Pardon Vote Matters Even If It Changes Nothing
With the courts offering no relief, Bankman-Fried turned to political channels. He applied for a presidential pardon from Donald Trump, a move that had been the subject of speculation in crypto circles for months. Trump stated in a January interview that he did not plan to grant one. This week, the US Senate made its own position explicit, adopting a unanimous resolution opposing clemency for the former FTX chief executive.
The resolution carries no legal force. It cannot prevent Trump from issuing a pardon if he chooses to do so. What it does reflect is the depth of bipartisan political resistance to any such move, and that resistance is partly shaped by a separate controversy. Many lawmakers have publicly criticised Trump’s decision to pardon former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao, a move that drew scrutiny because a UAE entity invested $2 billion into Binance around the same time using a stablecoin issued by World Liberty Financial, a crypto business connected to the Trump family. The optics of that sequence have made any further crypto-adjacent pardons politically costly, even for a president who has generally positioned himself as friendly to the digital asset industry.
For the broader crypto market, the FTX saga is entering its denouement. The exchange is gone, its founders are imprisoned or awaiting sentencing, its advisers are settling lawsuits, and its creditors are being made whole at rates that would have seemed implausible in late 2022. What remains is a cautionary architecture that regulators in Singapore, Malaysia, and across ASEAN have been quietly building into their licensing and custody requirements ever since. The $900 million heading out on July 31 is not just a repayment. It is the closing chapter of an argument about why those rules exist.
