Stay connected with KayaToday, follow us on Instagram and Facebook for the latest news and reviews delivered straight to you.
A 25-fold return on a single token in five years is the kind of number that tends to get dismissed as crypto boosterism. When it comes from the global head of digital asset research at Standard Chartered, one of the world’s largest trade finance banks, it at least deserves a careful read. Geoff Kendrick published that forecast this week, tying a price target of $200 for Chainlink’s LINK token by end-2030 to a specific structural thesis: that tokenized real-world assets will become a $4 trillion market by 2028, and that the infrastructure required to make that market function will flow disproportionately through Chainlink.
LINK currently trades around $8. The report was shared with Cointelegraph on Monday.
The Thesis Rests on a Very Large Number Becoming Real
Kendrick’s argument is not primarily about Chainlink itself. It is about the scale of asset tokenization he expects to unfold over the next few years. His forecast puts tokenized real-world assets at $4 trillion by end-2028, a figure that would represent a transformation of how bonds, equities, real estate, and other traditional instruments are issued and traded. Separately, the report projects a 37-fold rise in tokenized and crypto-native assets deployed in decentralized finance, reaching $2.7 trillion by end-2030.
Those are extraordinary projections, and they are worth contextualising against where the market sits today. Tokenized RWA trading on decentralised exchanges hit a new all-time high of $141 billion in July, a 19.5 percent monthly increase driven largely by public equities, according to data provider CryptoRank. That figure is real momentum, but it is also still a long way from $4 trillion. The gap between current volumes and Kendrick’s target requires sustained institutional adoption at a pace that has not yet been demonstrated.
The connection to LINK runs through a straightforward infrastructure logic. Tokenized assets sitting on a blockchain are only useful if they can interact with verified, real-world data: pricing feeds, compliance checks, interest rate benchmarks, corporate actions. That data has to come from somewhere trustworthy, and it has to move reliably between different blockchain networks. This is what oracle providers do, and Chainlink is the dominant player in that space. The protocol currently secures $34.4 billion in total value, according to DefiLlama. Its nearest competitor, Chronicle, secures $7.36 billion, meaning Chainlink holds a commanding lead that would be difficult to dislodge quickly.
Kendrick’s report states that the requirements of a large tokenized asset ecosystem, including trusted external data, cross-chain interoperability, privacy-preserving compliance tools, and integration with legacy financial infrastructure, are capabilities that “only Chainlink is currently equipped to provide.” That is a strong claim, and it is the central load-bearing pillar of the $200 price target.
What Could Break the Forecast
Kendrick does not present this as a certainty, and the risks he flags are the right ones to focus on. The first is pace: institutional tokenization initiatives could move more slowly than expected. Regulatory clarity, custodial infrastructure, and internal approval processes at large financial institutions all introduce friction that can delay adoption by years rather than months.
The second risk is competition. Chainlink’s current dominance in oracle services does not guarantee future dominance. Specialist oracle providers could emerge or scale to capture specific verticals, particularly if large institutions prefer to build bespoke data infrastructure rather than rely on a shared protocol. The history of financial technology is full of cases where an early infrastructure leader was eventually displaced or commoditised.
The third risk is technical. Chainlink’s architecture, like any complex decentralised system, carries the possibility of unforeseen vulnerabilities or performance limitations as the volume and complexity of data requests scales up. A significant technical failure at a moment of high institutional reliance would be damaging both operationally and reputationally.
There is also a valuation question the report does not fully address. Even if Chainlink’s fee generation grows substantially alongside the tokenized asset market, the translation from increased protocol revenue to a $200 token price involves assumptions about how the market will value that revenue stream. Token valuations in crypto have historically been volatile and not always tightly correlated with underlying fundamentals, which cuts both ways.
Why This Matters Beyond the Price Target
For investors and financial professionals in Malaysia and Singapore, the Standard Chartered report is worth tracking for reasons that go beyond whether LINK hits $200. Both countries are positioning themselves as regional hubs for digital asset activity. The Monetary Authority of Singapore has been actively developing frameworks for tokenized securities through its Project Guardian initiative, which has involved major banks testing tokenized bonds and funds. Malaysia’s Securities Commission has its own digital asset licensing regime and has shown interest in tokenized capital markets infrastructure.
If Kendrick’s broader thesis is correct, meaning that tokenized RWAs become a multi-trillion dollar asset class within this decade, then the oracle and interoperability layer of that infrastructure becomes systemically important financial technology. Institutions in this region that are building tokenization capabilities now will need to make decisions about which data infrastructure they rely on, and those decisions will have long-term consequences.
The $200 LINK target may or may not materialise. Price forecasts for crypto assets over five-year horizons carry enormous uncertainty, and Standard Chartered’s track record on specific token targets should be weighed alongside the structural logic of the report. What is harder to dismiss is the underlying direction: tokenized assets are growing, institutional interest is real, and the infrastructure that makes tokenization trustworthy and interoperable is going to matter a great deal. Chainlink’s current position in that infrastructure is genuine, even if its future dominance is not guaranteed.
Read More: H100 Group’s All-Share Bitcoin Merger Makes It Europe’s Second-Largest Corporate BTC Holder
