Skip to main content
Home » International Affairs » News » Ukraine Is Deploying Robots by Air and Sea, and the Tactics Are Evolving Fast

Ukraine Is Deploying Robots by Air and Sea, and the Tactics Are Evolving Fast

5 min read
Ukraine Is Deploying Robots by Air and Sea, and the Tactics Are Evolving Fast

Stay connected with KayaToday, follow us on Instagram and Facebook for the latest news and reviews delivered straight to you.


Modern warfare has always rewarded the side that adapts fastest, and Ukraine is currently running one of the most consequential military technology experiments in recent history. The country is not just deploying drones and robots separately. It is combining them into layered systems that deliver armed ground robots directly into contested positions, bypassing terrain, defenses, and the human cost of frontal assault.

Two incidents, one in June and one in July, illustrate how far this experimentation has advanced. Together they point toward a battlefield logic that is spreading beyond Ukraine and beginning to reshape how major militaries think about autonomous and semi-autonomous combat.

Airlifted Mines and Amphibious Robots

On July 19, a Russian military Telegram channel posted footage showing a Ukrainian hexacopter drone carrying a wheeled ground robot suspended beneath it by a cable. According to the Ukrainian government-run news platform United24, the drone was deploying an ARK-1 robot armed with explosive anti-tank mines, which then rolled toward Russian military positions after being set down. The ARK-1 can reach a top speed of nearly 28 miles per hour, though many comparable robots move considerably slower. The video drew outraged responses from pro-Kremlin social media users, suggesting the tactic landed with psychological as well as tactical impact.

The June incident was arguably more striking in concept. On June 25, during a Ukrainian operation targeting the Kinburn Spit, a narrow sandy peninsula extending westward into the Black Sea in Russian-occupied Kherson Oblast, a Ukrainian drone boat lowered a landing ramp and offloaded a ground robot onto the shore. The robot then fired its machine gun during what Michael Bohnert, a defense researcher at the RAND Corporation, described in a social media post as “mild” fighting. Ukrainian forces followed up with a flag-planting demonstration on the contested peninsula. The video was released by the Ukrainian government on July 13.

Bohnert called the amphibious robotic assault an impressive feat while also cautioning that the concept is probably not yet ready for heavy combat scenarios. That caveat matters. A flag-planting on a lightly defended spit is a demonstration of capability, not proof that robot-led amphibious assaults can succeed against fortified positions. Still, the fact that the concept was executed at all is significant.

Why the Numbers Behind This Matter

These headline moments sit on top of a broader and rapidly scaling robotic campaign. Ukraine’s military robotic missions climbed from just under 7,500 in January 2025 to more than 16,600 in June, according to United24. The missions span logistics, casualty evacuation, mine-laying and clearing, and direct combat engagement. That trajectory, more than doubling in six months, reflects a deliberate strategic choice to substitute machines for soldiers wherever possible against a Russian military that holds a significant manpower advantage.

The drone-carrier concept fits this logic precisely. Slower ground robots are vulnerable to Russian aerial surveillance and drone strikes while crossing open ground. Lifting them by air compresses the exposure window and allows them to bypass terrain that would otherwise slow or stop a wheeled platform. The tactic is an extension of an approach Ukraine has already applied to FPV attack drones, using large flying drones as motherships to carry smaller explosive drones closer to their targets before release. Ukraine has also sent high-altitude balloons deep into Russian territory to drop one-way attack drones and missiles near their targets. The Russian military has since developed its own carrier drone variants in response.

Ukraine’s drone boats have similarly evolved. Beyond the robot-delivery role demonstrated at Kinburn Spit, Ukrainian naval drones have been equipped to deploy swarms of FPV drones against Russian coastal positions. A sustained Ukrainian drone strike campaign has effectively halted Russian shipping of fuel, grain, and other supplies through the Sea of Azov, a strategic achievement that has strained Russian supply lines enough that Moscow began withdrawing forces from the Kinburn Spit in early June, before the June 25 operation even took place.

A Template Other Militaries Are Watching

The significance of Ukraine’s experimentation extends well beyond the immediate conflict. The US military has been studying Ukraine’s approach as it works to procure a new generation of drones, and has already taken some of the lessons into active operations. According to the Ars Technica report citing the ongoing conflict with Iran, the US military deployed its own kamikaze drone boats in combat for the first time during operations that continue to disrupt shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints.

For Southeast Asia, where maritime territorial disputes in the South China Sea remain unresolved and navies in the region are modernising rapidly, the implications are worth tracking carefully. The combination of drone boats, aerial carriers, and armed ground robots represents a relatively low-cost approach to projecting force in contested littoral environments, exactly the kind of geography that defines the region. None of the specific systems Ukraine is deploying require the industrial base of a major power to replicate, which means the tactical template is accessible to a wide range of actors.

What Ukraine is demonstrating, mission by mission, is that the threshold for a credible robotic combat capability is falling. The question for defence planners everywhere is not whether these systems will proliferate, but how quickly, and whether doctrine and rules of engagement can keep pace with the hardware.

Read More: Peace Reopened the Strait, The Relief Is Real — and Dangerously Easy to Overinterpret

Faraz Khan is a freelance journalist and lecturer with a Master’s in Political Science, offering expert analysis on international affairs through his columns and blog. His insightful content provides valuable perspectives to a global audience.
237 articles
More from Faraz Khan →
We follow strict editorial standards to ensure accuracy and transparency.