Stay connected with KayaToday, follow us on Instagram and Facebook for the latest news and reviews delivered straight to you.
Japan has long been one of the world’s most structured crypto jurisdictions, yet its regulator spent four years without granting a single new exchange licence. That freeze has now broken. Laser Digital, the digital asset arm of Japanese banking giant Nomura Group, has been authorised to operate as a crypto asset exchange service provider under Japan’s Payment Services Act, according to a list published by the Financial Services Agency on Friday. It is the first such approval since Binance Japan received FSA authorisation in October 2022.
The timing is not coincidental. Japan is in the middle of a deliberate, top-down overhaul of how it treats digital assets, and Laser Digital’s approval lands at the precise moment the country is reclassifying crypto from a payments curiosity into a fully regulated financial asset class.
Why a Four-Year Freeze Matters More Than the Licence Itself
A licensing gap of four years in a jurisdiction as active as Japan is not a sign of a dormant market. It reflects how cautious the FSA became after a string of high-profile exchange failures and hacks in the late 2010s. The agency tightened its review process substantially, and the bar for approval became high enough that most applicants either withdrew or never applied. The fact that Laser Digital cleared that bar is a signal in itself, because the firm is backed by Nomura, one of Asia’s most established institutional brokerages, and is explicitly targeting professional and institutional clients rather than retail traders.
Jez Mohideen, co-founder and CEO of Laser Digital, framed the approval in institutional terms. Japan’s crypto market is entering a “new phase of maturity,” he said in a Friday press release, creating a need for “trusted counterparties and infrastructure” as “institutional investors increase their interest in this asset class.” That language is deliberate. Laser Digital is not positioning itself as a retail exchange competing on fees and token listings. It is positioning itself as the kind of regulated, counterparty-risk-managed venue that a pension fund or asset manager would be comfortable using.
Japan Is Rewriting the Rules, Not Just Issuing Licences
The deeper story behind this approval is legislative. In July, Japan’s parliament passed revisions that reclassify crypto assets as financial assets under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, known as the FIEA. This is a meaningful shift. Under the current framework, digital assets sit inside the Payment Services Act, where they are treated primarily as payment instruments, similar to stored value or electronic money. The FIEA revision moves them into the same regulatory family as equities and bonds.
The practical consequences are significant. The new framework will introduce insider trading prohibitions for crypto, which do not currently exist in Japan. It will also bring stronger oversight requirements for businesses operating in the space. The crypto provisions will take effect on a date set by Cabinet order, within one year of the amendments being promulgated on July 23. That gives the industry a defined, if not yet precise, transition window.
Japanese Finance Minister Satsuki Katayama had signalled this direction as far back as January, stating the intent to bring crypto under the same umbrella as traditional finance assets so that citizens would “benefit from digital and blockchain-based assets.” The legislative follow-through in July, combined with the FSA’s decision to resume licensing, suggests the policy direction is now moving from rhetoric into implementation.
What This Means for the Broader Region
For investors and financial institutions in Malaysia and Singapore watching regional regulatory trends, Japan’s moves carry weight. The FSA’s willingness to grant a new licence to an institutionally backed firm, after a four-year pause, reinforces a pattern visible across Asia: regulators are not retreating from crypto, but they are increasingly sorting the market into tiers, favouring well-capitalised, institutionally oriented operators over retail-first exchanges.
Singapore’s MAS has followed a similar logic with its Digital Payment Token licensing regime, where approvals have been selective and the bar for compliance is high. Malaysia’s Securities Commission has taken a comparable approach with its registered digital asset exchange framework. Japan’s FIEA reclassification, if it proceeds smoothly, could add further pressure on regional regulators to align their frameworks with securities-style oversight rather than payments-style oversight, particularly as institutional capital continues to flow into the asset class.
The broader significance of the Laser Digital approval is not the single licence. It is what the licence represents: a major jurisdiction signalling that the institutional phase of crypto is real enough to warrant building the regulatory infrastructure to support it. Japan spent four years being cautious. It appears to have decided that caution now means building proper guardrails rather than keeping the gate closed.
Read More: Ethereum’s Next Big Upgrade Is Still a 66-Way Decision, and Privacy Is at the Centre of It
